Environmental risk assessments are a core part of responsible property development in Australia. Whether you're planning residential construction, commercial expansion, or rezoning a site, these assessments provide critical insights into contamination risks and regulatory compliance.
This article answers five commonly asked questions about environmental risk assessments in property development.
An environmental risk assessment (ERA) evaluates the potential for environmental harm arising from existing site conditions or future development activities. For property development, it typically focuses on:
The process includes a combination of desktop review, field investigation, laboratory testing, and risk modelling, depending on the project's complexity and risk profile.
Risk assessments are often required during:
Local councils and the NSW EPA may request a Preliminary Site Investigation (PSI), followed by a Detailed Site Investigation (DSI) and ERA to assess the level of contamination and recommend risk mitigation strategies.
Environmental risk assessments help uncover a wide range of potential hazards, such as:
Identifying these risks early allows developers to plan around them, factor costs into budgets, or avoid unsuitable sites altogether.
Risk assessments directly impact key project decisions:
In short, robust risk assessments reduce uncertainty and improve the likelihood of a smooth development process.
Only qualified and experienced environmental consultants should undertake ERAs. In NSW, consultants are expected to follow EPA guidelines, including:
Engaging the right consultants ensures the assessment is technically sound, defensible to regulators, and tailored to the specific development goals.
Environmental risk assessments are not just a tick-box requirement – they are a vital tool for informed, confident, and compliant property development. At Raw Earth Environmental, we specialise in helping developers and planners identify and mitigate risk early, so projects stay on track.